.
Feedback

Flood Insurance Program Extended for Five Years

We can look forward to a federal program with higher insurance rates and a larger emphasis on private sector participation in providing flood insurance.

President Obama signed into law on June 30 the Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act of 2012. Many of us in the insurance industry had been lobbying Washington DC to give us the much-needed reforms and permanency for our flood insurance markets.

Since 2008, the US Congress has let the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) expire 17 times and some of those expirations have impaired a wide variety of real estate transactions. With the passage of this new reform law the NFIP will remain in place for five years without any interruption.

There will be several changes to the flood insurance program; mostly provisions that will make the flood insurance program self-sustaining without the need for an infusion of money to keep the program afloat. Certain properties that are too close to tidal waters will see a phase-out of subsidies. The flood insurance program in the past had maximum annual increases of 10% these will now be increased to 20%.

Other noteworthy provisions of the new law:

  • Requires the NFIP Administrator to develop a plan for repaying the debt incurred from Hurricane Katrina
  • Mandates that rates for secondary homes, properties with repetitive flood claims and commercial properties will go up 20% over the next five years.
  • Policyholders will be allowed to pay in installments instead of one lump sum.

Many of the details of the law will be subject to regulatory interpretation and implementation over the next 2 to 3 years in a serious effort to make the federal program self-sustaining.

What we as consumers can look forward to is a federal program that will have insurance rates much higher than what we have seen in the past and a larger emphasis on encouraging greater private sector participation in providing flood insurance coverage.

OCTeaParty August 6, 2012 at 09:55 pm
How about a little personal responsibility? You bought in a flood zone, you accept the risk. Why does the government need to get involved?
Rich Hauswirth, CIC August 7, 2012 at 01:43 pm
OCTeaParty: Back in the 1960's the frequency and severity of flooding forced the insurance carriers to discontinue writing flood insurance. The government stepped in to create a market, and it worked very well for years. Financially the program was self-sustaining.
In the early 1990's we began seeing more frequent storms of greater severity and increased damage to property. By 2005 Katrina’s damage had placed the flood program in serious debt. Revisions to the program were necessary and solutions to the Katrina incurred debt had to be dealt with. This new law will address these issues. Hopefully the law will also encourage private insurance companies to come back into the market.
ted.dobracki August 7, 2012 at 04:41 pm
I have no problem with this as long as the rates reflect the true hazards. The advantage of this law is that it spreads the risks nationally, as compared to within state boundaries when a single disaster would likely bankrupt insurance companies that cover only a small region. One weakness in the past was the subsidization of coastal regions at the expense of interior regions, which also often need flood insurance. But as long as risks are weighed and rates adjusted properly, that will be an improvement. Now that there is more history to evaluate risks, those rates should be adjusted, and the exisiting deficit can and should be made up by those who choose to get the insurance in the future, without cost to the taxpayers.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lacey Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joey Joe June 19, 2013 at 09:13 pm
@proud-- I couldn't agree with you more. I found it quite ironic that she has a blog on Lacey PatchRead More on which she gives her profile, and it never once mentions her employment with Wall Township. Things that make ya go hmmmmmm.
Jennifer Bentley July 26, 2012 at 12:07 pm
Daniel is an amazing young man and we wish him all the best. He has always been kind to my childrenRead More and a volunteer in our community. My husband and I are lucky to know this family! We are happy to help in anyway possible to make Daniel's homecoming happen!
Tom Davis (Editor) July 29, 2012 at 01:14 pm
This is such a great, touching story
JENNY JONES August 12, 2012 at 08:19 pm
it is! has anyone tried to get the story more national? maybe start with channel 12 nj and go to cbsRead More nbc abc whatever
kitty June 16, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Aww! I'm glad your dad get better but it's funny part bout he said bout Philly lol
Myra Evans Hayhurst June 16, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Your father was truly blessed. I am so happy that you could wish him a Happy Fathers Day.
proud June 11, 2013 at 10:15 am
It's WHAFIS, not WHALIS, and it MUST be incorporated in the overland wave propagation modeling. I'veRead More been telling you this for weeks @Spooner. I offered to discuss it, but you were caught up on some sand blaster theory. BFE's will certainly be affected. As a sidebar, the author of the link mentioned mixed up the mapping terms. We currently have effective maps or FIRM's which establish BFE. The maps (ABFE)that were released in December and adopted as the state building code (+ freeboard) are advisory (incomplete and wrong). Working maps are due out in a few weeks followed shortly thereafter by preliminary maps, which are the maps that can be appealed. Approximately 18 to 24 months after the release of the preliminary maps there will be new effective maps (new FIRM's) with new BFE 's. If the preliminary maps are not drastically different than the ABFE's, you can count on a mass of appeals, and quite likely, protracted litigations.
proud June 11, 2013 at 10:17 am
@Spooner, I have something that you may want to read. Go to the Borough of Mantoloking website. OnRead More the right hand side is a column entitled Post Sandy Information. Near the bottom is a tab called "uncategorized". Click on it and there is a letter used as the Boro response to ABFE. It is very telling and makes a lot of sense.
patricia doyle June 19, 2013 at 11:00 am
Congrats, Pat. You deserve this. Despite all you've been through, you kept it going with your job,Read More your writing, and all the "chronicles" that expressed the plight of the Sandy victims in a way that no one else could. That has been so appreciated.
proud May 8, 2013 at 01:18 pm
Day Seven Laceygate Dr. Brower continues to be paid for doing nothing.
proud May 9, 2013 at 01:14 pm
Day Eight Laceygate Six grand and counting
proud May 10, 2013 at 10:15 am
Day Nine Laceygate Friday Night Live at a theater near you