.
Feedback

Flood Insurance Program Extended for Five Years

We can look forward to a federal program with higher insurance rates and a larger emphasis on private sector participation in providing flood insurance.

President Obama signed into law on June 30 the Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act of 2012. Many of us in the insurance industry had been lobbying Washington DC to give us the much-needed reforms and permanency for our flood insurance markets.

Since 2008, the US Congress has let the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) expire 17 times and some of those expirations have impaired a wide variety of real estate transactions. With the passage of this new reform law the NFIP will remain in place for five years without any interruption.

There will be several changes to the flood insurance program; mostly provisions that will make the flood insurance program self-sustaining without the need for an infusion of money to keep the program afloat. Certain properties that are too close to tidal waters will see a phase-out of subsidies. The flood insurance program in the past had maximum annual increases of 10% these will now be increased to 20%.

Other noteworthy provisions of the new law:

  • Requires the NFIP Administrator to develop a plan for repaying the debt incurred from Hurricane Katrina
  • Mandates that rates for secondary homes, properties with repetitive flood claims and commercial properties will go up 20% over the next five years.
  • Policyholders will be allowed to pay in installments instead of one lump sum.

Many of the details of the law will be subject to regulatory interpretation and implementation over the next 2 to 3 years in a serious effort to make the federal program self-sustaining.

What we as consumers can look forward to is a federal program that will have insurance rates much higher than what we have seen in the past and a larger emphasis on encouraging greater private sector participation in providing flood insurance coverage.

OCTeaParty August 6, 2012 at 09:55 pm
How about a little personal responsibility? You bought in a flood zone, you accept the risk. Why does the government need to get involved?
Rich Hauswirth, CIC August 7, 2012 at 01:43 pm
OCTeaParty: Back in the 1960's the frequency and severity of flooding forced the insurance carriers to discontinue writing flood insurance. The government stepped in to create a market, and it worked very well for years. Financially the program was self-sustaining.
In the early 1990's we began seeing more frequent storms of greater severity and increased damage to property. By 2005 Katrina’s damage had placed the flood program in serious debt. Revisions to the program were necessary and solutions to the Katrina incurred debt had to be dealt with. This new law will address these issues. Hopefully the law will also encourage private insurance companies to come back into the market.
ted.dobracki August 7, 2012 at 04:41 pm
I have no problem with this as long as the rates reflect the true hazards. The advantage of this law is that it spreads the risks nationally, as compared to within state boundaries when a single disaster would likely bankrupt insurance companies that cover only a small region. One weakness in the past was the subsidization of coastal regions at the expense of interior regions, which also often need flood insurance. But as long as risks are weighed and rates adjusted properly, that will be an improvement. Now that there is more history to evaluate risks, those rates should be adjusted, and the exisiting deficit can and should be made up by those who choose to get the insurance in the future, without cost to the taxpayers.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lacey Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
kitty June 16, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Aww! I'm glad your dad get better but it's funny part bout he said bout Philly lol
Myra Evans Hayhurst June 16, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Your father was truly blessed. I am so happy that you could wish him a Happy Fathers Day.
Spooner June 10, 2013 at 04:21 pm
Do new maps have FEMA's WHALIS modeling applied. Those preliminary maps didn't. Modeling willRead More affect final Base Flood Elevations(BFE)
proud June 11, 2013 at 10:15 am
It's WHAFIS, not WHALIS, and it MUST be incorporated in the overland wave propagation modeling. I'veRead More been telling you this for weeks @Spooner. I offered to discuss it, but you were caught up on some sand blaster theory. BFE's will certainly be affected. As a sidebar, the author of the link mentioned mixed up the mapping terms. We currently have effective maps or FIRM's which establish BFE. The maps (ABFE)that were released in December and adopted as the state building code (+ freeboard) are advisory (incomplete and wrong). Working maps are due out in a few weeks followed shortly thereafter by preliminary maps, which are the maps that can be appealed. Approximately 18 to 24 months after the release of the preliminary maps there will be new effective maps (new FIRM's) with new BFE 's. If the preliminary maps are not drastically different than the ABFE's, you can count on a mass of appeals, and quite likely, protracted litigations.
proud June 11, 2013 at 10:17 am
@Spooner, I have something that you may want to read. Go to the Borough of Mantoloking website. OnRead More the right hand side is a column entitled Post Sandy Information. Near the bottom is a tab called "uncategorized". Click on it and there is a letter used as the Boro response to ABFE. It is very telling and makes a lot of sense.
proud May 8, 2013 at 01:18 pm
Day Seven Laceygate Dr. Brower continues to be paid for doing nothing.
proud May 9, 2013 at 01:14 pm
Day Eight Laceygate Six grand and counting
proud May 10, 2013 at 10:15 am
Day Nine Laceygate Friday Night Live at a theater near you
PKS April 16, 2013 at 03:44 pm
Bye Bye.......and don't come back now ya hear!!!!
River City Rover May 9, 2013 at 12:31 am
You had yor head up your whatever and where not an investigative reporter. Pat Miller runs circlesRead More around you. RIP
People wake up May 21, 2013 at 02:10 am
You always did a great job !! Congratulations on your next journey in Life!! Thanks for keepingRead More us informed!! I hope this posting isnt rejected
GB Shore April 24, 2013 at 04:50 pm
Did he say he did? Typical Rep Club word twisting. YOU stop misrepresenting what he said. It'sRead More clear for all to see. Perhaps you did not recognize the word advice in the headline? Did you pass reading in school? Stop twisting and playing political games.
GB Shore April 24, 2013 at 04:52 pm
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? Scumbag??? really. Another loser Republican Club member. Yeah, theRead More Republican Club represents Lacey....PLEASE. He's someone who has a different view of the world. Stop being a jerk...JP, Rude One etc. aren't around anymore...your club is a farce and is dying...you certainly do noting for anyone unless they agree with your view of the world...sickening...
GB Shore April 24, 2013 at 04:58 pm
It's pretty clear this person is aligned with or part of the Republican Club in town. They don'tRead More like it that there are Reps' in town who don't like what the "official" Republican Club stands for. Too bad !!!!! As it is, I became an Independent because I could not stand having my name affiliated with these classless individuals anymore, or to have anyone think I support or align with their "chosen" candidates. they are an embarrassment. They can't think for themselves and they can't have a civil debate of ideas....this was instilled for years by JP....since he's not around any longer, they are trying to uphold this pitiful positioning about what it means to run and be a civil servant. Quite sad for that matter... BTW, I spoke in person with Greg....he's a fine person and a Police Officer. CERTAINLY more class in his pinky than Resident of Lacey and his ilk.
Kim May 12, 2013 at 05:30 pm
They are definitely here to stay and our efforts at getting rid of them are ill-conceived. We canRead More move them from one place to another, if absolutely necessary. Where I live in Scarsdale NY, Geesebusters got rid of the geese from the library pond. The pond is now devoid of waterfowl but loaded with turtles for some reason. Pretty soon people will be complaining about salmonella, calling them an "invasive species" or some other ridiculous argument. In my town, egg-oiling was done to keep the population in check, and if this annual process is done in every community (takes about a day or two once per year), the whole issue can be put in perspective and costs nothing. People really need to get over this irrational irritation with geese.
proud May 12, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Not only that, the rhythm method does not work.
proud May 12, 2013 at 05:58 pm
The Canada Goose--not Canadaian Goose-- or Canada Geese in the plural form ( and of which there areRead More several sub species) is native to North America and can be found in Canada, the USA and Mexico,as well as Europe and even as far away as China. Canada, as we know it today, was under British rule from 1763 ( the treaty of Paris) until 1867 when it became it's own dominion. Prior to that it was largely populated by the French which ceded most of it's North American Colonies after the Seven Years' War. Preceding the arrival of the Colonial Eurpeans, modern day Canada and been inhabited by distinct groups of Aboriginal civilizations for centuries dating back to the arrival of the Paleo-Indians. For what it is worth, Native American Goose would be much more fitting identification than Canada Goose. That being said, the geese are here to stay.I don't care how many kites you fly or how many dogs are being supported by the Lacey Township Board of Education. With the apparent distaste of the Natural Gas Industry by various federal administrations, I would support technology that would convert goose droppings to an energy producing fuel. Supply and demand would support this outside the box thinking. Go Green!
no_money_left March 23, 2013 at 10:51 pm
at this time you do NOT need to worry about the comp sales or whatever reduction you are asking forRead More - just leave it blank on the form. Just complete the portion that is applicable to your current situation. Your comps and requested valuation is needed 7days before your appeal hearing.. You will need to provide that information to the county, town tax assessor and clerk. Write the information as a letter and hand deliver - get them to date stamp your copy. When you are researching comps go to the property tax web site (listed below) to see the data on the lot size, house size and MOST importantly - NON USE CODE. There are about 30 variations. Use sales that are dated 10/2011 to 10/2012. If you use a appraiser- it cant be a bank apprasial and the appraiser MUST be present at the hearing. Lastly - you can not make any statments on $ VALUATION - you are not qualified.. so dont bother to try to add or reduce value for anything different on your comps. Your town tax collector and town atty will not allow it at the hearing. http://www.njactb.org/
JOHNNY Done it March 24, 2013 at 02:56 pm
IF you are doing it this way you are going to tax court ,You put the comparable sales down youRead More usually get this worked out before you go to tax court between the assessor & you. Make sure you have additional of the 5 requested on the form just in case some of them they will not let you use
JOHNNY Done it March 24, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Go to APP ,com go on data universe go on property sales fill in the search ..2012 sales These willRead More list when it was filed with the county.. than go to Zillow ,com with addresses more info about the houses are there to see if they are comparable to yours ,property size, square footage ,and amount of rooms & baths