Local Lawmakers Again Push for Bill Criminalizing Crash-Scene Photography

State Sen. Chris Connors, Assembly members reintroduce bill prompted by Barnegat crash that killed Manchester woman

After seeing their sponsored bills aiming to protect accident victims' privacy die in committee in both houses of the state Legislature last session, the delegates for New Jersey's 9th District are again pushing to make it a crime for emergency workers to photograph those involved in crashes.

Republican state Sen. Christopher J. Connors and Assembly members Brian E. Rumpf and DiAnne C. Gove have put the bill forward in the Senate and the Assembly, and this time hope to see it signed into law.

"We're starting earlier in the process," said Connors, "and we have about 5,000 signatures on a petition from individuals in various parts of the state who support the legislation. We'll carry that all to the committee chairs so they can understand the public support behind this bill."

The legislation was spurred by an October 2009 incident in Barnegat. Cathy Bates, a Manchester woman, was killed in a car accident on Route 72 in the township. In the minutes after the crash, a volunteer first responder took photographs of Bates and posted them to Facebook before Bates' family members knew about the accident, said the 9th district delegation in a press release.

Since then, Bates' mother, Stafford resident Lucille Bates-Wickward, has advocated for a law that would make it a crime for first responders to distribute photographs or recordings of an accident without a family's consent.

In a time when widespread use of social media means a photo or video can be posted and viewed by millions very quickly, protecting vulnerable people from exposure is necessary, said Connors.

"We obviously believe that this is a priority," said Connors, "but the fact is there are a lot of legislators that are still unaware that this is an issue." 

Connors said he has sent a letter to the chair of the State Senate's Law and Public Safety Committee, pointing out the thousands of signatures of support the bill has garnered since it was first introduced. Connors is still awaiting a reply, but he said he and Rumpf and Gove aren't going to stop working to get the bill passed.

"This is high on our list of things to do," he said.

bg robbins January 28, 2012 at 06:55 AM
This seems like it would be an infringment on freedom of the Press.....What would be next......criminalizing talking about a crash scene?
Sean Conneamhe January 28, 2012 at 08:10 AM
"Such a law is unnecessary and probably unconstitutional."
Michael Glenn January 28, 2012 at 04:19 PM
5000 people may support it but a million people can sign, and it is still unconstituitonal. It should simply be against the agency policy. unpaid means expulsion, paid means penalty up to termination. unless the agency has a division that specifically has a photo rep/unit that understands the legal and social issues involved. The probloem here is we are trying to write a law every time someone does something stupid, and we are using taxpayers time and money to do it.
Michael Glenn January 28, 2012 at 04:21 PM
the provider in question was subject to the agency rules at the time and only enjoys the 1st amendment right during that time, at risk to his remaining a member.
Mark Wendell January 28, 2012 at 05:09 PM
Michael, I agree with you. It sould be an agency rule. I find it amazing that 1 person can lack a little class and then we are in Trenton with it.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »